Last week no less than 1.2 million Dutch people have been watching the broadcast of the 2006 Gouden Loeki, the Dutch audience award for TV advertising. I'm not much of a fan of statistics and figures for the sake of figures, but 1.2 million is an awfull lot on a total population of let's say 10 million adults. These people were watching commercials for over an hour... They did not go and get coffee. They did not leave for taking a leak. They did not zap away. They deliberately tuned in to a programme that was all about and celebrating TV commercials. Is advertising really dead? I don't think so. Yes, crap advertising lies six feet under and old school advertising is its neighbour. But well crafted great ads can still steal the hearts of the audience. (No, the length of my nose remains unchanged...)
Robert, commercials as content in a tv-programme has earlier proven to be good content. Shows on/about commercials are mainly fun to watch. Because you CHOOSE to watch! Normally however, TVC's are interruptions of the things people CHOOSE to watch. So, the only thing this proves is that the same content can in fact be experienced differently (due to context). And: advertising dead? You silly doubter!
Posted by: Wim Andrea | January 24, 2007 at 22:47
I think that your comment is just what needs to be added to my post. Especially in these days. I couldn't agree more. Although the point I wanted to make here is that not only overload and the increasing ability to escape has lead to people running away from intrusive ads. I think that the rubish nature of most ads have speed-up that process. To put it bluntly: there is good and bad advertising. And you are right: the choice you make as to how and when you present your story is of crucial importance.
Posted by: Robert | January 26, 2007 at 09:41